Legislature(2011 - 2012)SENATE FINANCE 532
03/21/2011 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB18 | |
| SB97 | |
| SB102 | |
| SB23 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 18 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 97 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 102 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 23 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE
March 21, 2011
9:04 a.m.
9:04:57 AM
CALL TO ORDER
Co-Chair Stedman called the Senate Finance Committee
meeting to order at 9:04 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Lyman Hoffman, Co-Chair
Senator Bert Stedman, Co-Chair
Senator Johnny Ellis
Senator Dennis Egan
Senator Donny Olson
Senator Joe Thomas
MEMBERS ABSENT
Senator Lesil McGuire, Vice-Chair
ALSO PRESENT
Tim Lamkin, Staff, Senator Stevens; Tim Grussendorf, Staff,
Senator Hoffman; Bruce Johnson, Executive Director, Alaska
Council of School Administration; John Alcantra, National
Education Association of Alaska; Kathy Wasserman, ALaska
Municipal League; Jay Livy, Staff, Senator Hoffman; Wanetta
Ayers, Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic
Development; John Rense, Senior Operations Manager, NANA
Development Corporation; Brice Haberger, Tradesman, Juneau.
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE
Luke Hopkins, Mayor, Fairbanks; John Bolling, City of
Craig; Bryan Zack, Homer; Elaine Price, Southeast Island
School District; Bear Ketzler, City of Tanana; Maya
Salganek, University of Alaska, Fairbanks; David
Greathouse, Producer, WARP Films; Cindy Draper, ABC
Motorhomes; Matt Moser, Staff, Senator Ellis.
SUMMARY
SB 18 - DURATION OF REGULAR LEGISLATIVE SESSIONS
CSSB 18 (STA) as amended was REPORTED out of
committee with a "do pass" recommendation and
with two previously published fiscal impact notes
from the Legislative Affairs Agency.
SB 97 - COMMUNITY REVENUE SHARING/EDUC FUNDING
SB 97 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
SB 102 - AK AFFORDABLE HEATING PAYMENT PROGRAM
SB 102 was HEARD and HELD in committee for
further consideration.
SB 23 - FILM PRODUCTION TAX CREDIT
SB 23 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
SENATE BILL NO. 18
"An Act relating to the duration of regular sessions
of the legislature; and providing for an effective
date."
9:06:23 AM
TIM LAMKIN, STAFF, SENATOR STEVENS, apologized for Senator
Stevens' absence, and offered to answer any questions.
Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1, Gardner 27-
LSO122\1.5. He stressed that there was a technical
amendment on line 3, and stated that "2014" should be added
because it would be the second session of the Legislature.
Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED for purpose of discussion.
Co-Chair Hoffman felt it was too early to extend the
duration of the legislature. He requested that it be
enacted in three years. He stressed that it would work
better in 2014.
Co-Chair Stedman WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
further OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Co-Chair Stedman referred to the two previously published
fiscal notes (LAA).
Senator Olson wondered if the bill only dealt with the
length of the duration, rather than the date which session
begins. Mr. Lamkin stated that there was an accommodation
made, so that session would begin on the third Tuesday of
January in the second session of the Legislature.
Senator Olson stressed that there were some legislators
that had school children, so the students would be required
to switch schools at unusual times. He wondered if there
was a consideration to move the session start-date later in
the year. Mr. Lamkin replied that Senator Stevens would be
open to discussion. He pointed out that there was an option
to begin each session on the exact same day, and only the
end date would fluctuate. He felt that there was some
consideration of the potential disruption to Juneau's
tourism economy, if the session were moved closer to the
summer months.
Senator McGuire MOVED to report CSSB 18 (STA) as AMENDED
out of committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying previously published fiscal note(s). Seeing NO
OBJECTION it was so ordered.
SENATE BILL NO. 97
"An Act authorizing additional appropriations for
public education and for community revenue sharing
based on the price of Alaska North Slope crude oil,
and adjusting the formula for payments to
communities."
9:12:21 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman stated that high oil prices added
operating burdens to local governments and schools.
TIM GRUSSENDORF, STAFF, SENATOR HOFFMAN, highlighted some
changes to SB 97. He began with Section 1, which presented
the formula and the money that would be appropriated to the
Department of Education. Section 2 addressed a technical
change, which would assure that the fund would always reach
$180 million. Section 3 would add a new sub-section D,
which was a calculation that would add the new formula to
the revenue sharing.
9:15:07 AM
Mr. Grussendorf presented "Goal: Increase Community Revenue
Sharing when there is a GF Surplus" (copy on file). He
stated that $89/per barrel was the trigger-point, but there
was still an effort to make a more accurate trigger-point.
He stated that the decision to use $89 per barrel, because
it was the amount needed to balance the state's budget. He
looked at line G, and stated that revenue-sharing would
eliminate the $60 million, that it was formulated to do. He
looked at line H, and stated that the full revenue sharing
would be $82 million. He looked at line J, and stated that
the revenue would be due to the progressive taxation of
oil. He explained that the excessive revenue would not go
directly into the formula, but would be calculated out as
the same proportion as the first $60 million. He stressed
that as long as the formula was above $60 per barrel, the
formula should produce at least $60 million.
9:18:26 AM
Co-Chair Stedman queried the payout date. Mr. Grussendorf
replied that the payout date was not yet solidified. He
stated that the revenue sharing would go out at the
beginning of the fiscal date. He noted that the payout date
would probably be sometime in August.
9:19:04 AM
Co-Chair Stedman commented that a determination of the
price trigger needed to be solidified. He stated that cost
stress on small communities would be alleviated.
9:20:38 AM
Senator Thomas wondered if the date was referring to the 90
day period. Mr. Grussendorf replied that that was one
option, and they were looking at the yearly average.
Senator Thomas wondered if there was consideration for tax
credit return based on progressivity, and wondered if there
was a comparison. Co-Chair Stedman requested a rough
concept of the revenue. Mr. Grussendorf replied by
referring to line J of the spreadsheet.
Co-Chair Stedman would like to call it credits, rather than
progressivity. Mr. Grussendorf agreed.
9:23:01 AM
Co-Chair Stedman wondered if $3.5 billion referred to
spending. Mr. Grussendorf replied with 3.2 percent or $22
million would be collected in credits.
Co-Chair Stedman stated that $2.5 billion would be
collected, and reiterated that it was a small fraction of
the progressivity. He stressed that all of the terms would
be open for discussion.
9:24:08 AM
Senator Olson wondered if there would be possible retro-
active mandates for tax payments. Mr. Grussendorf requested
further explanation.
Senator Olson referred to discussion related to retroactive
tax collecting. He wondered if there was a retroactive date
for the tax. Mr. Grussendorf replied that there were no
discussions regarding retroactive tax collections.
9:25:22 AM
Senator Olson wondered if there would be an increase in the
rural school districts. Mr. Grussendorf replied education
would be separate, after the formula was established.
9:26:19 AM
Senator Olson looked at column D, and wondered what impact
the potential rise 28 percent might have on the state. Mr.
Grussendorf was unsure.
Senator Olson noticed that they would not only get 3.2
percent, but an additional 8 percent. He wondered how much
that would increase the revenue. Mr. Grussendorf replied
that the spreadsheet did not include that amount.
9:27:11 AM
Co-Chair Stedman stated that the progressivity tax was
included to ensure that the percentage does not decline the
state's share of the oil profits.
9:28:51 AM
Co-Chair Stedman reiterated that the concept was on the
table for discussion.
Co-Chair Stedman looked at one fiscal note from the
Department of Education and Early Development, which showed
an increase of $22 million in K-12 funding; and another
fiscal note from the Department of Commerce, Community, and
Economic Development that showed an increase of $22 million
in community revenue sharing.
LUKE HOPKINS, MAYOR, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference), spoke
in favor of SB 97. He stated that there was a backlog of
school maintenance. He remarked that revenue sharing had
been used in years prior, to avoid tax payer contributions.
He remarked that when oil prices grew, they had to apply an
appropriation in order to cover increased costs.
9:31:56 AM
JOHN BOLLING, CITY OF CRAIG (via teleconference), spoke in
favor of SB 97. He stated that the municipality appreciated
the Legislature's appropriation of money.
9:32:41 AM
BRYAN ZACK, HOMER (via teleconference), spoke in favor of
SB 97. He requested a change from $84 per barrel to be used
as a trigger point.
9:35:57 AM
ELAINE PRICE, SOUTHEAST ISLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT (via
teleconference), spoke in favor of SB 97.
9:36:33 AM
BEAR KETZLER, CITY OF TANANA (via teleconference), spoke in
favor of SB 97.
9:38:19 AM
BRUCE JOHNSON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ALASKA COUNCIL OF SCHOOL
ADMINISTRATION, spoke in favor of the concept of SB 97. He
explained that there was an extraordinary cost related to
heating and oil costs. He offered his assistance in the
continued refinement of the bill.
9:39:17 AM
Co-Chair Stedman suggested consideration for the amount
that was proposed for the revenue sharing and the schools.
Mr. Johnson agreed to help.
9:39:53 AM
JOHN ALCANTRA, NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION OF ALASKA,
spoke in favor of SB 97. He stressed that 89 seemed too
high a trigger.
9:42:13 AM
KATHY WASSERMAN, ALASKA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, spoke in favor of
SB 97. She stressed that the municipalities agreed to share
in the funds when oil prices go up. She reiterated that
many communities face high oil prices, and find it
difficult to provide basic services. She stated that basing
one day as a target was unfair, but getting an average on
holidays might be better. She offered to work with the
Legislature in determining the best approach.
9:44:23 AM
Co-Chair Stedman closed public testimony.
Co-Chair Hoffman stated that the struggling municipalities
and school districts had asked for assistance. He stated
that there may have been an initial concern of relying on
the funds. He stressed that the funds would only be
available in times of high oil prices.
SB 97 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
SENATE BILL NO. 102
"An Act relating to certain payments made under the
Alaska affordable heating program."
9:45:56 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman stressed that there was a high cost of
heating in many areas of the state, because of the
dependence on diesel fuel.
9:47:02 AM
JAY LIVY, STAFF, SENATOR HOFFMAN, presented SB 102 proposed
changes to the Alaska Affordable Heating Program, to
clarify that the Department of Health and Social Services
may prorate benefits, should insufficient funds be
available.
Mr. Livy pointed out two changes. He pointed to line 11,
which included the addition of "and see." He explained that
that change would include the benefit calculations in the
prorated areas. He also looked at line 12, which added the
words "on a prorata basis."
Mr. Livy stressed that there were no policy changes, and
the language was strictly technical.
Co-Chair Stedman referred to one zero fiscal note from the
Department of Health and Social Services.
9:50:15 AM
Senator Olson referred to a 50 percent cut by the Obama
Administration in the Federal Low Income Heating Program.
He wondered if that cut had been taken into consideration.
Mr. Livy replied that the state received about $18 million
in federal funds, but there was a 50 percent cut. He
stressed that Alaska could receive up to $10 million less
to spend in the next year. He explained that the bill was
drafted based on requirements to fill the benefit need:
either from the general fund or federal funds.
9:52:06 AM
Senator Olson pointed out that the bill did not make up for
the lost federal funds. Mr. Livy agreed.
9:52:35 AM
SB 102 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
SENATE BILL NO. 23
"An Act relating to transferable film production tax
credits; and providing for an effective date by
amending the effective dates of secs. 3 and 4, ch. 63,
SLA 2008."
9:53:22 AM
Senator Ellis welcomed MATT MOSER, STAFF, SENATOR ELLIS.
9:53:49 AM
AT EASE
9:53:55 AM
RECONVENED
9:54:31 AM
Senator Ellis presented the PowerPoint Presentation,
"Senate Bill 23: Extending the Film and Television
Production Tax Incentives." He stated that welcoming the
multi-billion dollar film and television production
industry to Alaska was a rare opportunity to grow and
develop a new industry in the state. It would create jobs
for Alaskans and diversify the economy. He stated that the
legislation would continue the growth and success of
Alaska's developing film and television production. He
stressed that the private sector was needed to ensure the
incremental capital investments. He felt that this
legislation would offer the private sector the certainty
that Alaska is open for business.
9:55:11 AM
Senator Ellis stated, "The film tax credit passed by the
legislature in 2008 is largely responsible for the recent
growth in this industry. Since their inception in 2008, 15
productions have received tax credits. These 15
productions filmed in Alaska for a total of 910 days and
had a total Alaska spend of nearly $15 million dollars.
As of January, 2011 there are an additional 28 productions
that are pre-qualified for Alaska Film Incentives. If all
these productions are completed they will have an estimated
additional projected Alaska spend of nearly $85 million
dollars. This brings the total projected potential boost to
Alaska's economy since 2008 to nearly $100 million
dollars."
9:56:31 AM
Senator Ellis presented slide 4. He stated that the
projected boost to the economy since 2008 was nearly $100
million.
9:57:02 AM
Senator Ellis presented slide 5, and stated "This $100
million dollars translates in to thousands of jobs,
opportunities for businesses large and small. We have
already seen the benefits of recent multi-million dollar
productions. There were hundreds of Alaskans working as
cast and crew, in jobs as varied as electricians,
carpenters, truck drivers, caterers, security guards and
plumbers. Mr. Chairmen, filming and production has taken
place in 35 communities all over our state."
Senator Ellis presented slide 6, and stressed that many
small business were positively affected by the legislation,
including ocean cargo shipping, rental cars and RV's, to
property rental, construction work, hotels, restaurants and
engineering firms.
9:57:55 AM
Senator Ellis presented slide 7, and explained that there
were many exciting projects in progress. He also stressed
that there was potential for training and education in film
and television production. He pointed out the
infrastructure around the industry was so booked with
shoots, that they did not have crew enough to meet the
demands.
9:58:51 AM
Senator Ellis presented slide 8 and stated that the
legislation would extend the film and television production
tax for ten years, and offered and additional $100 million
dollars in tax incentives for each five-year period.
9:59:38 AM
Senator Ellis presented slide 9, and pointed out the
legislation would continue to bring new money to Alaska's
economy; keep our businesses busy and put Alaskans to work;
and diversify our economy and grow and develop this new and
multi-million dollar business in Alaska.
10:01:25 AM
Senator Ellis presented slide 10, and noted that the
legislation would create diversification of the economy;
new private sector jobs; new opportunities for large and
small businesses; infusion of construction dollars; public
relations; opportunities in rural Alaska; and tax credits
for Alaska corporations.
10:02:05 AM
Co-Chair Stedman referred to two fiscal notes from the
Department of Revenue and Department of Commerce,
Community, and Economic Development.
10:02:49 AM
MAYA SALGANEK, UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA, FAIRBANKS (via
teleconference), spoke in favor of SB 23. She felt that the
passing of the legislation would encourage further study
and training in film and television production.
10:07:23 AM
WANETTA AYERS, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AND
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, presented PowerPoint Presentation:
"Alaska Film Office Program Overview" (copy on file). She
stated that there was a desire to develop Alaska as a
preferred film destination.
10:08:17 AM
Ms. Ayers discussed slide 2, and stated that the Alaska
Film Office had five mandates: 1. cooperate with
organizations in the private sector for the expansion and
development of the film production industries in the state;
2. promote Alaska as an appropriate location for film
production; 3. provide production assistance through
connecting film directors and makers, and producers with
Alaska location scouts and contractors, including
contractors providing assistance with permit applications;
4. certify Alaska film production internship training
programs and promote the employment of program interns by
eligible productions; and 5. in cooperation with Department
of Revenue, administer the Alaska Film Production Incentive
Program.
10:08:54 AM
Ms. Ayers discussed slide 3, and stated that the Alaska
Film Office approached private sector collaboration in a
variety of different ways. She explained that their website
was a portal for a variety of information about the program
and interacts with the Alaska Film Office. She stated that
the Alaska Film Office was engaged with industry
organizations, trade associations, and allied groups; and
engaged in outreach through speaking engagements, targeted
contacts, and fielding daily inquiries.
10:09:51 AM
Ms. Ayers discussed slide 4, and stated that there was a
variety of print advertising in magazines, directories,
brochures, and websites to promote Alaska.
Ms. Ayers displayed slide 7, and stated that it was an
example of a customized program brochure that outlined the
production incentive and the advantages of filming in
Alaska.
Co-Chair Stedman asked about Alaska Hire provision, and how
it was implemented. Ms. Ayers replied that there was an
additional 10 percent credit for the wages that were
expended in Alaska for Alaska residents.
10:11:21 AM
Ms. Ayers discussed slide 8, and stated that the Alaska
Film Office provided assistance by responding to daily
inquiries about filming in Alaska; conducting follow-up and
outreach with contacts developed through advertising, trade
show and other promotional activities; meeting with
producers and providing introductions to states and local
contacts; explaining the Incentive Program and assisting
producers with the application process; providing
alternatives and creative solutions to production
challenges; and working with Alaskan businesses, community
representative and other stakeholders regarding prospective
projects.
10:12:08 AM
Ms. Ayers looked at slide 9, and stated that the Alaska
Film Office wanted to increase hiring of Alaskans. She
stated that hundreds of Alaskans had been employed in
Alaska. She stated that they were working with the
Department of Labor with regard to some apprenticeship
programs that could lead to technical careers in the film
industry. She furthered that the University of Alaska would
provide the academic programs that lead to certificates and
degrees recognized by the film industry. She stated that
private sector efforts would provide on-the-job training.
10:14:02 AM
Ms. Ayers detailed Slide 10 and explained the process for
the review of the final applications. She stated that there
was a pre-qualification process, which required the Alaska
Film Office to work with producers. She stated that once
the pre-qualification was approved, the production process
ensued. Once the production expenses were incurred in
Alaska, there was an audit, and final application and
approval of the process. A review committee that looked at
the final application and advances a notification to the
Department of Revenue that the final application was
approved, and the Department of Revenue would take over for
issuing a tax credit certificate.
Co-Chair Stedman surmised that there was an audit before
approval. Ms. Ayers responded that there was a requirement
for the production company to hire and Alaskan Certified
Public Accountant to audit the Alaska production costs.
Co-Chair Stedman asked if the audits were current. Ms.
Ayers answered yes.
10:15:27 AM
Ms. Ayers discussed slide 11, and stated that the displayed
chart summarized experience-to-date with regard to pre-
qualifications that were approved by fiscal year since the
implementation of the film production incentive program.
She furthered that slide 12 displayed a summary based on
pre-qualification.
10:16:05 AM
Ms. Ayers looked at slide 13, and stated that there were
two staff positions in the Alaska Film Office with
additional support provided by the state.
Ms. Ayers displayed slide 14, and explained that at the
implementation of the program conceived $275,000 per fiscal
year. She stated that in the current year, there was
$283,000 added, but it did not include estimation of
additional support costs. She stated that there was an
unallocated overhead cost of $27,800 for a total of
$310,800.
10:16:49 AM
Ms. Ayers showed slide 15, and stated that the film
industry was rapidly evolving. She explained that there
were a number of productions that were ready to produce in
Alaska.
Co-Chair Stedman wondered if the Department of Commerce,
Community, and Economic Development supported SB 23. Ms.
Ayers replied yes.
10:18:54 AM
JOHN RENSE, SENIOR OPERATIONS MANAGER, NANA DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, spoke in support of SB 23. He stated that the
bill would encourage economic diversity.
10:23:23 AM
BRICE HABERGER, TRADESMAN, JUNEAU, spoke in favor in SB 23.
He stated that he provided scouting services for the film
industry.
10:25:31 AM
DAVID GREATHOUSE, PRODUCER, WARP FILMS (via
teleconference), spoke in favor of SB 23.
10:29:55 AM
CINDY DRAPER, ABC MOTORHOMES (via teleconference), spoke in
favor of SB 23. She stated that they provided business for
the film, "Everybody Loves Whales."
10:31:00 AM
Senator Ellis expressed excitement for the discussion
regarding SB 23. He looked forward to working towards a
committee substitute
10:31:19 AM
Senator Olson wondered if it was a surprise how successful
the original legislation had become. Senator Ellis remarked
that it was surprising. He pointed out that there were some
skeptics, but the legislation had been successful.
Co-Chair Stedman remarked that Alaska was in an economic
upturn, while other states were experiencing economic
trials.
SB 23 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
ADJOURNMENT
10:32:33 AM
The meeting was adjourned at 10:32 AM.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 18 Legislation Intro'd_byState.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 18 |
| SB 23 Alaska Film Incentives - Economic Impact.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM SL&C 2/22/2011 1:30:00 PM |
SB 23 |
| SB 23 Letters supporting.PDF |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM SL&C 2/22/2011 1:30:00 PM |
SB 23 |
| SB 23 Muni of Anchorage economic goal.PDF |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM SL&C 2/22/2011 1:30:00 PM |
SB 23 |
| SB 18 Legislation Passed by State.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 18 |
| SB 18 New FN LAA Salaries and Allowances.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 18 |
| SB 18 New FN LAA Session Expenses.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 18 |
| SB 18 Ratio_Legislation Intro'd to Passed_byState.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 18 |
| SB 18 Sectional_CS_STA_ version I.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 18 |
| SB 18 Session Limit Methods.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 18 |
| SB 18 Sponsor Presentation.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 18 |
| SB 18 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 18 |
| SB 18 Support Letter FbksNewsMiner.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 18 |
| SB 18 Support Letter Juneau Chamber.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 18 |
| SB 18 Support Letter JuneauEmpire.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 18 |
| SB 18_ Support Letter_ Fran Ulmer.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 18 |
| SB 97 2011_03_14 AML reThanks.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 97 |
| SB 102 Sponsor Statement.docx |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 102 |
| HB 67 - SB 23 Anch. Resolut Sppt.pdf |
HEDT 2/17/2011 10:15:00 AM SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
|
| SB 23 Press Clippings.PDF |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM SL&C 2/22/2011 1:30:00 PM |
SB 23 |
| Sb 23 Sponsor Statement.PDF |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM SL&C 2/22/2011 1:30:00 PM |
SB 23 |
| SB 23 Sectional Summary Version X.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 23 |
| SB 23 SFIN Version X.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 23 |
| SB 23 Additional Support Letters.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 23 |
| SB 23 Markel Letter of Concern.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 23 |
| SB 97 3 2 11 rev sharing with annual trigger.xls |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 97 |
| SB 97-CCED-DCRA-03-19-11.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 97 |
| SB 97-EED-ESS-3-20-11.pdf |
SFIN 3/21/2011 9:00:00 AM |
SB 97 |